Table 2 |
||||||||||
|
Changes in HRV related to physical treatments for depression other than SSRIs or TCAs. |
||||||||||
| Measure |
Heart Rate |
SDNN |
SDANN |
RMSSD |
LF |
lnHF |
HF |
LF/HF |
CV |
pNN50 |
| Units |
bpm |
ms |
ms |
ms |
ms2 |
ms2 |
ms2 |
ratio |
ratio |
percent |
|
|
||||||||||
| Reboxetine short supine |
||||||||||
| Mean Baseline Value |
82.60 |
18.50 |
946.00 |
354 |
||||||
| Mean Percent Change |
5.6% |
-1.6% |
-18.9% |
21.8% |
||||||
| Number of Comparisons |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
||||||
| Mean Effect Size |
1.32 ns |
-0.04 ns |
-0.38 ns |
0.79 ns |
||||||
| Nefazodone short supine |
||||||||||
| Mean Baseline Value |
75.80 |
30.08 |
24.50 |
864.00 |
480 |
2.97 |
3.80 |
|||
| Mean Percent Change |
-5.9% |
14.3% |
4.1% |
-5.7% |
-10.4% |
-5.7% |
-2.6% |
|||
| Number of Comparisons |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|||
| Mean Effect Size |
-1.60 * |
0.08 ns |
0.11 ns |
-0.08 ns |
-0.20 ns |
-0.16 ns |
-0.21 ns |
|||
| Bupropion short supine |
||||||||||
| Mean Baseline Value |
28.10 |
|||||||||
| Mean Percent Change |
-42.7% |
|||||||||
| Number of Comparisons |
1 |
|||||||||
| Mean Effect Size |
-1.99 * |
|||||||||
| Mirtazapine short supine |
||||||||||
| Mean Baseline Value |
66.00 |
49.60 |
6.50 |
5.40 |
||||||
| Mean Percent Change |
15.29% |
-35.7% |
-21.5% |
-25.9% |
||||||
| Number of Comparisons |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
||||||
| Mean Effect Size |
3.10 * |
-2.47 * |
-1.81 * |
-3.97 * |
||||||
| ECT short supine |
||||||||||
| Mean Baseline Value |
548.00 |
264.00 |
||||||||
| Mean Percent Change |
-42.9% |
50.4% |
||||||||
| Number of Comparisons |
1 |
1 |
||||||||
| Mean Effect Size |
-0.88 ns |
0.84 ns |
||||||||
| ECT 24 h |
||||||||||
| Mean Baseline Value |
69.65 |
8.64 |
||||||||
| Mean Percent Change |
6.2% |
34.3% |
||||||||
| Number of Comparisons |
1 |
1 |
||||||||
| Mean Effect Size |
0.51 ns |
0.90 ns |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
All treatments on this table are represented by only one study except ECT where the two studies employed different recording times. ns indicates that original study or our reanalysis showed the change as non-significant, * indicates that the original study reported that the change was significant (p < .05). |
||||||||||
|
van Zyl et al. BioPsychoSocial Medicine 2008 2:12 doi:10.1186/1751-0759-2-12 |
||||||||||